The Hidden Costs of Projects

Measuring and Reducing Waste

What Is Waste in Projects?

Waste in projects is an often underestimated but widespread problem that can have serious consequences for the success and efficiency of projects. According to a comprehensive study on measuring waste in projects, the Project Management Waste Index (PMWI) averages about 25 percent. The PMWI study shows that waste not only affects financial resources but also consumes time, talent, and energy.

Types of waste

The Project Management Waste Index (PMWI) identifies several specific types of waste that frequently occur in projects and can impair efficiency and success:

• Downtime: Time lost when projects come to a standstill due to delays, bottlenecks, missing information, missing materials, or unclear decisions. Long periods of downtime can jeopardize the entire project schedule and lead to increased costs.
• Over-engineering: Work that goes beyond what is necessary to meet the requirements. This includes unnecessarily detailed or excessively complex work that does not add any additional value.
• Errors: Flaws or defects that require rework or corrections. Errors often result from misunderstandings, a lack of care, or unclear requirements, and lead to additional effort and costs.
• Misallocation: The inefficient allocation of resources, in which employees or funds are used for the wrong tasks or less important ones, which impairs productivity and slows down the project. However, misallocation also occurs when there is a shortage of resources, resulting in work packages not being completed, being completed only superficially, being completed incorrectly, or taking too long to complete.
• Mismanagement: On the one hand, mismanagement can involve launching unnecessary or ill-conceived projects. However, it can also involve incorrect instructions or misunderstandings that lead to work that does not align with the project’s objectives. This can be caused by unclear communication, misunderstandings, or a lack of coordination. Unclear priorities, a lack of agreement, or unclear responsibilities also lead to delays, discussions, and undesirable behaviors, and are thus a cause of waste in the project.
• Unnecessary movement: Superfluous movements of people or materials that do not directly add value. These can include, for example, unnecessary travel or travel time that does not add value to the project. However, this waste can also be caused by poorly designed workstations or inefficient processes. Unnecessary changes to project outcomes, processes, or organization—such as those caused by new supervisors—also result in unnecessary movement. Multitasking and task switching also fall into this category.
• Incomplete Work: Incomplete work occurs when tasks are only superficially completed. This is the case, for example, when plans and results are inadequately documented. However, this type of waste also frequently occurs when communication within the project is suboptimal, resulting, for example, in results that do not meet expectations and require rework.
  According to the PMWI study, the most significant types of waste in projects are waiting, misallocation, and overprocessing, with waiting for deliveries, lack of personnel capacity, and insufficient documentation being the most common causes of waste.

Identify waste in projects

Recognizing waste in projects is a crucial step toward identifying its causes and subsequently making targeted improvements. There are various methods for doing this:

1. Value Stream Mapping:

Value Stream Mapping is a visual method for analyzing and illustrating all the steps in a process, from order placement to delivery. This method helps visualize the entire project workflow. It allows you to identify which steps actually add value and which are inefficient or result in unnecessary wait times.

2. Time records and process analysis:

Systematically tracking the time spent on various tasks and activities within a project is another method for measuring waste. This involves tracking how much time is spent on value-adding activities and how much on non-value-adding activities. This makes it possible to identify waiting times, interruptions, or inefficient processes.

3. Cost analysis:

A thorough review of project expenses can also reveal where financial resources are being used inefficiently. This includes analyzing expenses for materials, personnel, external services, and other project costs. By comparing actual costs with the budget, it is possible to identify areas where unnecessary expenses were incurred. This analysis helps reduce costs and improve budget control.

4. Process Key Performance Indicators (KPIs):

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are specific metrics used to evaluate the success and efficiency of processes. KPIs such as cycle time, lead time, defect rate, and resource utilization can be used to measure waste. By continuously monitoring these metrics, sources of waste can be easily identified. At the same time, trends that indicate waste can be detected, for example, through analysis using a business intelligence solution.

5. Feedback loops and employee surveys:

Employees and project participants often have valuable insights into inefficient processes and waste because they are directly involved in them. Through regular feedback loops and targeted surveys, companies can therefore collect qualitative data that points to waste.

Recognizing the causes of waste

Once the biggest sources of waste within projects have been identified, the next step in preventing waste is to understand its causes. A root cause analysis can help with this. In Lean Management, techniques such as the 5 Whys method or Ishikawa diagrams (fishbone diagrams) are used for this purpose.

5-Why-Method:

The 5 Whys method is a simple yet effective technique for root cause analysis. It is used to identify the root cause of a problem by asking “Why?” five times. Each “Why?” step deepens the analysis by asking about the cause of the immediately preceding problem. The process is repeated until the deepest or most fundamental cause of the problem is identified. This helps address the root of the problem rather than merely treating the symptoms.

Example: The project deadline was missed.

1. Why was the deadline missed? – Because the last task wasn't finished on time.
2. Why wasn’t the last task completed on time? – Because the necessary information was missing.
3. Why was the information missing? – Because the team responsible wasn’t informed.
4. Why wasn’t the team informed? – Because there was no clear communication.
5. Why was there no clear communication? – Because there are no defined communication processes in place.

The root cause here would be the lack of clear communication processes.

Ishikawa diagram (fishbone diagram):

The Ishikawa diagram, also known as a fishbone diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is a visual tool for root cause analysis. It helps systematically identify and map out the various potential causes of a problem and is particularly useful for visualizing complex problems and facilitating a structured discussion on root cause analysis.
The diagram is shaped like a fishbone, with the problem at the “head.” Once the problem is defined, the main categories of causes are identified. These are added to the diagram as individual “bones.” These can be different categories, such as people, methods, machines, materials, the environment, or management. Under each category, the specific causes that could contribute to the problem are then listed. These causes can then be analyzed further to identify the root cause of the problem.

Example: In the case of a quality problem, the diagram could show that the causes lie in the categories "Materials" (e.g. faulty raw materials), "Machines" (e.g. incorrect calibration) and "People" (e.g. inadequate training).

Taking measures against waste

Once the causes are known, measures can be developed to address them. These may include, for example, redesigning processes, introducing new technologies, or making changes to the way work is organized.

1. Wait Times: If wait times are caused by bottlenecks, they can be eliminated fairly easily by allocating new or better-suited resources and through proactive planning. Where possible, automating routine tasks also helps reduce wait times and free up resources. Clearly defined communication channels and regular status updates also help ensure that decisions are made and communicated quickly.
2. Over-engineering: Waste resulting from over-engineering can be avoided through clearly defined requirements, effective prioritization of tasks with a focus on minimum requirements, and clear quality standards. If you are currently working with traditional project management methods, switching to agile methods—which involve iterative development processes and regular feedback—can help prevent unnecessary work from being done.
3. Errors: Regular testing and quality assurance measures throughout the project help identify errors early on and take corrective action. Training and professional development enable the project team to identify and correct errors.
4. Misallocation: When it comes to misallocation, effective resource management is also key to avoiding waste. Resource management tools help ensure that projects are assigned the right employees and skills, as well as all necessary resources. Regularly reviewing and optimizing resource allocation also helps to quickly identify and address any misallocations.
5. Misalignment: Measures to prevent misalignment should be taken even before the project begins. Effective project portfolio management enables you to select the right projects, prioritize them, and clearly define their objectives. In addition, responsibilities should be clearly defined and communicated—ideally before the project begins—to avoid misunderstandings. During project implementation, effective project management with regular reviews helps ensure that the project stays on track. Clear communication processes and thorough project documentation also help ensure that all team members receive the necessary information and instructions.
6. Unnecessary Movement: Unnecessary physical movements can be reduced through good workplace design, a streamlined process layout, and the use of digital tools. Good resource management and clear priorities reduce multitasking and task switching. Effective change management is also important for minimizing necessary adjustments in projects.
7. Subcontracting: When subcontracting, clear communication—particularly regarding expectations for how a task should be completed—is important. This helps prevent misunderstandings and errors. In addition, work results should be thoroughly documented. Regular feedback loops also ensure that the work meets expectations and allow for timely revisions if necessary.

Conclusion

Waste in projects is a widespread problem that can have a significant impact on success, efficiency, and costs. By systematically identifying and measuring waste, targeted measures can be taken to eliminate it.

Find out more about the myPARM project and portfolio management software:

Would you like to get to know myPARM in a demo? Then make an appointment with us right away!