Project Management ABC: P for PERT – Program Evaluation and Review Technique

Focus on PERT: Strategies for Realistic Scheduling

What is PERT?

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) was developed in the 1950s by the United States Navy to manage the Polaris program—the development of a ballistic missile defense system. The goal was to create a tool that would account for uncertainties in scheduling while still providing a realistic basis for project management.
At its core, PERT is a network-based scheduling method that depicts project activities in relation to one another and takes into account the estimated durations for each activity. Unlike traditional Gantt Charts, which represent linear sequences, PERT focuses on the logical relationships and shows the critical path of a project. This critical path is essential because it determines the minimum duration of the project.

The basics of PERT

PERT is based on the assumption that the duration of individual project activities is not precisely known and is therefore specified as a probability distribution. Three time estimates come into play here:

1. Optimistic duration (“a”): The shortest duration possible under ideal conditions.
2. Pessimistic time (“b”): The longest duration that can occur under unfavorable conditions.
3. Most likely time (“m”): The most realistic estimate under normal conditions.

The expected time ("te") for each activity is calculated from these three values by applying the following formula:

te = (a + 4m + b) / 6

This weighted average takes into account that the most likely time (m) is given greater weight than the two extreme values (a and b).

Creation of a PERT diagram

A PERT chart is created in several steps:

1. Identify Tasks: All necessary activities are defined and broken down into their individual components.
   Example: A team is planning to organize a conference. The main tasks include: selecting the venue, inviting participants, preparing materials, and conducting a dress rehearsal.
2. Defining Sequences: The logical order and dependencies of the activities are determined. This clarifies which tasks are interdependent and which can be carried out in parallel.
   Example: The venue must be selected before inviting participants and preparing materials. The dress rehearsal takes place after the materials have been prepared, and all other tasks must be completed before the conference.
3. Make time estimates: The three time estimates (a, m, b) and the expected duration (te) are determined for each activity.
   Example:
   

   Task	a (optimistic)	m (likely)	b (pessimistic)	te (expected)
   Select a venue	2 days	4 days	6 days	4 days
   Send an invitation	1 day	2 days	3 days	2 days
   Prepare materials	3 days	5 days	7 days	5 days
   Conduct a dress rehearsal	1 day	2 days	3 days	2 days

4. Creating a network diagram: Activities are represented graphically in the form of a network. Nodes represent events (milestones), while arrows symbolize activities and dependencies. Dotted arrows often indicate a dependency that does not require resources—that is, one that does not require an activity to be performed.
   Example: The network diagram shows the sequence of tasks and their dependencies.
5. Determining the Critical Path: The critical path is identified by calculating the paths with the longest total duration. This path is crucial because delays in these activities will delay the entire project.
   Example: In this case, the critical path is: Select venue → Prepare materials → Dress rehearsal → Conference. The expected minimum duration of the project is therefore 11 days.

Advantages of the PERT method

The use of PERT offers numerous advantages:

• Realistic Scheduling: By accounting for uncertainties in the planning process, PERT provides more realistic time estimates than traditional methods.
• Focus on critical activities: The critical path clearly highlights which tasks require special attention to avoid project delays.
• Flexibility: The method is ideal for projects with a high degree of uncertainty or many unknown variables, as it takes various scenarios into account.
• Transparency: Through the visual representation of the project structure, all stakeholders can easily see which tasks are interdependent and how changes will impact them.
• Early Problem Identification: Potential bottlenecks or delays can be identified early on, allowing countermeasures to be implemented.

Challenges and limitations of PERT

Despite its strengths, PERT also has some weaknesses that project managers should be aware of:

• Time-Consuming Preparation: The detailed recording of activities and time estimates requires a significant amount of planning, especially for large and complex projects.
• Subjectivity: The accuracy of time estimates depends on the experience and judgment of the people involved.
• Not suitable for simple projects: For small or less complex projects, the benefits of PERT may not justify the effort.
• Does not account for costs: PERT focuses exclusively on scheduling and does not take financial aspects into account. For more comprehensive project planning, it should therefore be combined with other methods, such as cost-benefit analysis.

Conclusion

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) is a valuable tool in project management, particularly for complex projects with uncertain time estimates. It offers a structured approach to planning and managing projects and helps identify and minimize risks early on. At the same time, however, the method requires a significant amount of planning effort and well-founded time estimates. By combining PERT with other methods, project managers can ensure comprehensive planning and lead projects to success more efficiently.

Find out more about the myPARM project and portfolio management software:

Would you like to get to know myPARM in a demo? Then make an appointment with us right away!